Pelatihan Pengembangan Micro Modul Digital Berbasis Case Methode Di SMKN 8 Pinrang

Authors

  • Andi Muhahammad Irfan, Universitas Negeri Makassar,  Indonesia
  • Badaruddin Anwar, Universitas Negeri Makassar,  Indonesia
  • Fahri Anwar, Universitas Negeri Makassar,  Indonesia
  • Achmad Romadin, Universitas Negeri Makassar,  Indonesia
  • Nur Fuadah, Universitas Negeri Makassar,  Indonesia

Keywords:

Case Method, Micro Modul Digital, Pelatihan Guru, Media Pembelajaran Interaktif, Pendidikan Vokasi

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam dunia pendidikan menuntut guru untuk menguasai metode pembelajaran inovatif, seperti Micro Modul Digital berbasis Case Method. Namun, di SMKN 8 Pinrang, guru masih mengalami keterbatasan dalam pemahaman dan keterampilan pengembangan media pembelajaran digital yang interaktif. Program pengabdian ini bertujuan meningkatkan kompetensi guru melalui pelatihan intensif menggunakan model ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Pelatihan difokuskan pada perancangan micro modul digital interaktif dan penerapan Case Method, serta penggunaan perangkat lunak seperti Canva, Genially, dan Articulate Storyline. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dalam kemampuan guru merancang bahan ajar digital, serta kesiapan mengintegrasikannya ke dalam proses pembelajaran. Program ini tidak hanya memperkuat pemanfaatan teknologi dalam pendidikan vokasi, tetapi juga mendorong pembelajaran yang lebih kontekstual, kolaboratif, dan adaptif terhadap kebutuhan era digital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and opportunities of e-learning implementation in Iraq: A case of public universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Anwar, F. (2025). Pengaruh Lingkungan Fisik Terhadap Efektivitas Pelatihan Guru di Era Digital. UNM Press.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Sun, S. Y. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers & Education, 45(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.

Earthman, G. I. (2004). Prioritization of 31 criteria for school building adequacy. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Maryland.

Fisk, P. (2021). Education 4.0: The future of learning will be dramatically different. Pearson Education.

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Hartono, Y., & Putri, A. D. (2024). Integrating Case-Based Learning in Technical Education: A Model for Effective Digital Instruction. Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13(1), 50–64.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kurniawan, D., Puspitasari, R., & Hafsari, M. (2023). Microlearning-based Digital Modules to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 45–56.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

Lin, H. F. (2007). Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 817–820. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9948

Lim, D. H. (2001). Adult learners’ motivation in self-directed e-learning. Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference, 281–288.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.

Novamizanti. (2024). Desain Pelatihan Inovatif Berbasis Teknologi dan Kebutuhan Dewasa. Jakarta: Kencana.

Nugroho, A., & Yamtinah, S. (2022). Digital Literacy in Vocational Teacher Education: Challenges and Strategies. Journal of Technical Education, 5(2), 122–130.

Oliver, R. (1997). Teaching and learning with technology: Towards a learner-centred approach. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, 770–774.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Prasetyo, A. R., Sari, P. M., & Hadi, S. (2022). Design of Interactive Learning Modules in Vocational Schools using Articulate Storyline. Jurnal Edutech, 8(1), 18–29.

Rahmawati, I., Lestari, D., & Salim, A. (2023). Strengthening Teachers' Competence in Digital Module Development through Project-Based Training. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 87–96.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2017). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.). Pearson.

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.

Suparman, M. A. (1997). Desain Instruksional Modern. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Suyanto. (2020). Desain dan Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt Brace.

Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Tsai, M. H. (2011). Developing a sustainable distance learning environment using an educational blog. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2129–2140.

Widodo, A., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Enhancing Student Engagement in Online Learning using Interactive Multimedia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(10), 33–45.

Wibawa, B., & Mukti, I. (2018). Pembelajaran digital dalam pendidikan vokasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 24(2), 85–91.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Yunita, M. A., & Kurnia, F. (2023). Case Method in Digital Teaching Materials: A Breakthrough in Vocational Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 75–84.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-05

How to Cite

Irfan, A. M., Anwar, B., Anwar, F., Romadin, A., & Fuadah, N. (2025). Pelatihan Pengembangan Micro Modul Digital Berbasis Case Methode Di SMKN 8 Pinrang. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Nusantara, 6(3), 4346-4357. Retrieved from https://ejournal.sisfokomtek.org/index.php/jpkm/article/view/6706

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Edisi Juli - September

Section

Pendidikan dan Literasi Masyarakat

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Andi Muhahammad Irfan, Badaruddin Anwar, Fahri Anwar, Achmad Romadin, Nur Fuadah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.