Implementasi dan Evaluasi Penerimaan Sistem Pendaftaran Inhal Praktikum Berbasis Google Workspace Menggunakan Metode TAM

Ridhani Anggit Safitri; Rizal Pratama Putra; Muhammad Aly Sa`id

doi:10.55338/jumin.v7i3.8941

Authors

Ridhani Anggit Safitri Universitas Islam Indonesia
Rizal Pratama Putra Universitas Islam Indonesia
Muhammad Aly Sa`id Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55338/jumin.v7i3.8941

Keywords:

Black Box Testing, Google Workspace, Inhal Practicum, Technology Acceptance Model, Waterfall

Abstract

Pendaftaran inhal praktikum di laboratorium komputer perguruan tinggi umumnya masih dilakukan secara manual. Seiring berkembangnya teknologi digital di lingkungan akademik, terbuka peluang untuk mengoptimalkan proses tersebut melalui pemanfaatan layanan berbasis cloud. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan dan mengevaluasi penerimaan sistem pendaftaran inhal praktikum berbasis Google Workspace. Sistem dikembangkan menggunakan metode waterfall dengan mengintegrasikan Google Form, Google Sheets, dan Google Mail, kemudian diuji secara fungsional menggunakan black box testing. Evaluasi penerimaan pengguna dilakukan dengan kuesioner berbasis Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yang mengukur empat konstruk, yaitu perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), attitude toward using (ATU), dan behavioral intention to use (BIU), terhadap 76 responden mahasiswa. Data dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak R. Hasil pengujian black box menunjukkan seluruh fungsi sistem berjalan sesuai harapan. Seluruh 17 item kuesioner dinyatakan valid dan reliabel dengan nilai Cronbach's Alpha antara 0,917 sampai 0,957. Tingkat penerimaan pengguna pada keempat konstruk berada pada kategori tinggi dengan rata-rata keseluruhan 3,544. Analisis korelasi menunjukkan hubungan positif dan signifikan antar konstruk pada taraf 1%. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan Google Workspace untuk pendaftaran inhal dapat diterima dengan baik oleh pengguna dan menjadi alternatif yang relevan untuk mendukung layanan administratif laboratorium.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Benavides, J. Tamayo Arias, M. Arango Serna, J. Branch Bedoya, and D. Burgos, “Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 3291, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20113291.

M. I. Dacholfany, T. R. Noor, E. Diana, M. Nurzen. S, and D. Prayoga, “Identification of higher education administration applications efforts to improve digital-based academic services,” Linguistics and Culture Review, vol. 5, no. S2, pp. 1402–1414, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1948.

M. Alenezi, “Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education,” Educ. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 88, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13010088.

M. A. Ayanwale, R. R. Molefi, and S. Liapeng, “Unlocking educational frontiers: Exploring higher educators’ adoption of google workspace technology tools for teaching and assessment in Lesotho dynamic landscape,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 9, p. e30049, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30049.

D. I. Pratiwi and B. Waluyo, “Autonomous learning and the use of digital technologies in online English classrooms in higher education,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 2, p. ep423, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13094.

S. A. Salloum, A. Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, M. Al-Emran, A. Abdel Monem, and K. Shaalan, “Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 128445–128462, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467.

F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.

R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and J. Tondeur, “The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 128, pp. 13–35, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.

A. Granić and N. Marangunić, “Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 2572–2593, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12864.

A. S. Al-Adwan, N. Li, A. Al-Adwan, G. A. Abbasi, N. A. Albelbisi, and A. Habibi, ““Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”,” Educ. Inf. Technol. (Dordr)., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 15381–15413, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3.

R. De, A. G. Cantana, W. Gunawan, and P. W. Rahayu, “RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM INFORMASI MANAJEMEN PENGELOLAAN SARANA SEKOLAH BERBASIS WEB,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 114–126, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.36002/JUTIK.V11I2.3744.

N. K. Ariasih and A. W. Putra, “RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM INFORMASI KEUANGAN DANA BOS BERBASIS WEB,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer, vol. 8, no. 2, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.36002/jutik.v8i2.1591.

N. A. Maghfirin, E. Kurniawan, and A. Farhan, “ANALISIS KOMPREHENSIF PERFORMA SISTEM DAN TINGKAT PENERIMAAN PENGGUNA APLIKASI PERPUSSMULANDU,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 219–230, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.36002/JUTIK.V11I2.3787.

A. Saravanos and M. X. Curinga, “Simulating the Software Development Lifecycle: The Waterfall Model,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 108, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/asi6060108.

R. S. Pressman and B. R. Maxim, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: A PRACTITIONER’S APPROACH, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2019.

A. Mishra and Y. I. Alzoubi, “Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1504–1522, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13198-023-01958-5.

T. S. Jaya, “Pengujian Aplikasi dengan Metode Blackbox Testing Boundary Value Analysis (Studi Kasus: Kantor Digital Politeknik Negeri Lampung),” Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–48, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.30591/jpit.v3i1.647.

S. Nidhra, “Black Box and White Box Testing Techniques - A Literature Review,” International Journal of Embedded Systems and Applications, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29–50, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.5121/ijesa.2012.2204.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” Sep. 01, 2003. Accessed: May 16, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3375136

N. Marangunić and A. Granić, “Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 81–95, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.

V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Manage. Sci., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.

V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 451–481, Sep. 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.

P. Y. K. Chau, “An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 185–204, Sep. 1996, doi: 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518128.

I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

The R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2026.

W. Revelle, Package ‘psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Researc. Northwestern University, 2023.

H. A. DeVon et al., “A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability,” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 155–164, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x.

M. Tavakol and R. Dennick, “Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha,” Int. J. Med. Educ., vol. 2, pp. 53–55, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.

K. S. Taber, “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1273–1296, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.